Case Summary: Extraodinary Emergency Defence

Case Summary

Charge:

The Defendant was charged with driving a motor vehicle while disqualified by a Court Order, contrary to traffic legislation. This offence carries a maximum penalty of 60 penalty units or 18 months imprisonment.

Prosecution Case:

Defence:

The Defendant raised the statutory defence of "Extraordinary Emergency", arguing she drove only because her then-partner had threatened to kill her dog, and she needed to remove the dog (and herself) from immediate danger.

Findings of the Court:

1. Extraordinary Emergency Established

2. Ordinary Person Test

3. Holistic Consideration of Domestic Violence

Conclusion / Orders:

Final Orders:

Key Legal Principle:

A person is not criminally liable if they act under an extraordinary emergency, where their response is one that an ordinary person in the same circumstances could not reasonably be expected to avoid.